Background: The myocardial uptake of (99m)Tc-sestamibi is attenuated by dobutamine stress, resulting in underestimation of ischemia. N-Ethyl-N-ethoxy-dithiocarbamato-N-(99m)Tc ((99m)Tc-N-NOET) is a new (99m)Tc-labeled perfusion agent that is highly extracted by the myocardium by a mechanism different from that defined for (99m)Tc-sestamibi. We therefore hypothesized that (99m)Tc-N-NOET uptake would not be attenuated by dobutamine and that (99m)Tc-N-NOET uptake would be comparable to (201)Tl uptake during dobutamine stress.
Methods and results: In 28 open-chest dogs, after placement of a stenosis in the left anterior descending coronary artery that reduced flow reserve by >50%, adenosine (300 microgram. kg(-1). min(-1); n=15) or dobutamine (2.5 to 30 microgram. kg(-1). min(-1); n=13) was infused. During adenosine stress, the stenotic-to-normal activity ratio for (99m)Tc-N-NOET was 0.55+/-0.05. The stenotic-to-normal flow ratio was 0.33+/-0.04 at the time of (99m)Tc-N-NOET injection. During dobutamine stress, the stenotic-to-normal (99m)Tc-N-NOET activity ratio was 0.63+/-0.04, comparable to the (201)Tl activity ratio of 0.59+/-0.04. The stenotic-to-normal flow ratio was 0.47+/-0.04 at the time of (99m)Tc-N-NOET and (201)Tl injection. The relationship between (99m)Tc-N-NOET uptake and blood flow was comparable for adenosine and dobutamine stress, with no evidence of attenuation of (99m)Tc-N-NOET extraction by dobutamine. Conclusions-In the presence of coronary stenoses that reduced regional flow reserve, the myocardial uptake of (99m)Tc-N-NOET and (201)Tl are closely proportional to blood flow during both adenosine and dobutamine stress, suggesting that the adverse effect of dobutamine on (99m)Tc-sestamibi uptake is a tracer-specific phenomenon rather than a generalized effect. The clinical implication of this finding is that (99m)Tc-N-NOET might be preferable to (99m)Tc-sestamibi when used with dobutamine stress for detection of coronary stenoses.