We compared the effectiveness of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and DNA blot analysis (DBA) for detecting clonal T-cell populations and investigated whether a nonradioactive PCR method could be used in routine clinical diagnosis. We analyzed DNA from 117 cases for T-cell clonality by PCR amplification. DBA was performed on 77 of these cases. Denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PCR-PAGE) of radiolabeled PCR products and capillary electrophoresis (PCR-CE) of fluorescently labeled PCR products were used for PCR product separation and quantitation. Complete agreement was obtained between PCR-PAGE and DBA in 67 of 77 cases. One case was positive by DBA and negative by PCR-PAGE, and 3 cases were positive by PAGE and negative by DBA. Five cases indeterminate by DBA were positive by PCR-PAGE, and 1 indeterminate case was negative by PCR-PAGE. In the comparison of PCR-PAGE and PCR-CE, of 63 cases with height ratios less than 2.0, all were negative by PCR-PAGE. Of 52 cases with height ratios of 2.0 or more, 50 were positive by PCR-PAGE. We conclude that PCR-CE is analytically equivalent to DBA and PCR-PAGE for detecting clonal T-cell populations. The PCR-CE method is semiquantitative and, therefore, may be more objective than gel-based methods.