Purpose: To describe differences in health status (symptoms, physical function, and quality of life) between continued medical management and transmyocardial revascularization with a carbon dioxide laser in patients with severe, symptomatic, inoperable coronary artery disease.
Subjects and methods: This prospective, multicenter trial randomized 98 patients to transmyocardial revascularization and 99 to continued medical therapy. Health status was assessed with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire and the Short Form-36 at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months. A new analytic technique, the benefit statistic, was developed to facilitate interpretability of disease-specific health status assessments over time.
Results: Of the 99 patients assigned to medical therapy, 59 (60%) subsequently underwent transmyocardial revascularization. By an intention-to-treat analysis, patients initially randomized to transmyocardial revascularization had 44% of their angina eliminated versus 21% for the medical treatment group (difference = 23%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11% to 34%). Differences in the benefits of transmyocardial revascularization on physical limitations (33% vs 11% in the medical arm [difference = 23%; 95% CI, 15% to 31%]) and quality of life (47% vs 20% in the medical arm [difference = 26%; 95% CI, 18% to 35%]) were similarly large. These benefits were apparent at 3 months and sustained throughout the 1 year of follow-up. An efficacy analysis that excluded patients who crossed over from the medical treatment to transmyocardial revascularization arm suggested greater treatment benefits.
Conclusions: Transmyocardial revascularization may offer a valuable palliative alternative to patients with severe limitations in health status for whom no standard revascularization options exist.