The effect of demineralized bone matrix gel on bone ingrowth and fixation of porous implants

J Arthroplasty. 2002 Jun;17(4):402-8. doi: 10.1054/arth.2002.32169.

Abstract

The presence of demineralized bone matrix (DBM) gel did not enhance or accelerate attachment strength or bone ingrowth and resulted in a significant decrease in implant interface attachment strength at 3 weeks. Hydroxyapatite (HA) coating resulted in significant increases in interface shear strength and bone ingrowth compared with non-HA-coated porous implants at all time periods. The HA-coated implants achieved greater attachment strength and bone ingrowth at earlier time periods and maintained greater attachment strength at long-term periods. The results of this study indicate that in the presence of a good bone-implant interference fit, there is no beneficial effect in applying DBM gel to a porous-coated or HA-coated porous implant surface. The small amount that can be applied and the degree of osteoinductivity of DBM seem to preclude it from having a significant biologic effect.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Bone Matrix*
  • Dogs
  • Durapatite
  • Femur / surgery
  • Osseointegration*
  • Prostheses and Implants*

Substances

  • Durapatite