Continuous evaluation of patient satisfaction in endoscopy centres

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002 Jul;37(7):850-5.

Abstract

Background: A randomized sample of 14,000 men and women, aged 55-64 years, resident in the City of Oslo and Telemark County, were drawn from the population registry to be offered a flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening examination. A questionnaire was designed to modify routines and evaluate patient satisfaction.

Methods: Consecutive participants (4956) were given a questionnaire immediately after the FS to be filled in and returned by mail on the following day. Participants were asked questions about service, practical issues, and the level of pain during the FS and post-examination discomfort. They were also encouraged to give their comments in free text.

Results: Questionnaire replies were received from 4574 (92%) out of 4956 participants. The vast majority reported to have experienced no (70%) or slight (21%) pain during the examination. Women reported pain and post-examination discomfort more often than men. Pain was also associated with age of the patient and length of bowel examined, but not with total examination time. The proportion of painless examinations varied between endoscopists from 62% to 81%. For all endoscopists collectively, this improved during the study period, irrespective of past experience, but trainees seemed to adopt the score of their masters.

Conclusions: The study demonstrated that the use of feedback information in an endoscopy screening unit may be useful in improving standards, including the performance of endoscopists. It is possible that the introduction of similar feedback systems in routine endoscopy laboratories may in the long run improve the reputation of gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Ambulatory Care Facilities / standards*
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / prevention & control
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mass Screening
  • Middle Aged
  • Pain Measurement / methods*
  • Patient Satisfaction*
  • Program Evaluation*
  • Quality of Health Care*
  • Sigmoidoscopy / standards*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires