Rorschach training: doctoral students' experiences and preferences

J Pers Assess. 2002 Aug;79(1):39-52. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7901_03.

Abstract

American Psychological Association graduate student affiliates (500) were sent surveys regarding their Rorschach training experiences and interests. From 254 valid surveys, 87% of students reported that they were offered an introductory course that included the Rorschach; only about one fourth of the students were offered an advanced course. Of the students (212) who had some Rorschach training, the majority (78%) indicated they would like to obtain more. Most students viewed the Rorschach as helpful for understanding a client's personality. More training is needed, however, in applying this understanding to treatment planning and client feedback. Students were more satisfied with their training when they (a) had more Rorschach experience (didactic, practical, and research familiarity), (b) were in a psychodynamic or eclectic versus cognitive-behavioral program, (c) were pursuing a clinical PsyD versus clinical PhD, and (d) perceived a more positive attitude toward the Rorschach in their training program. All of these variables (including training satisfaction) also were related to students' expected likelihood of using the Rorschach in their professional careers.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Education, Graduate / statistics & numerical data
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Psychology, Clinical / education*
  • Psychometrics / education*
  • Rorschach Test*
  • United States