Population forecasting theory, methods and assessments of accuracy. The magnitude of error due to different vital processes in population forecasts

Int J Forecast. 1992 Nov;8(3):301-14. doi: 10.1016/0169-2070(92)90049-f.

Abstract

PIP: The accuracy of population forecasts depends in part upon the method chosen for forecasting the vital rates of fertility, mortality, and migration. Methods for handling the stochastic propagation of error calculations in demographic forecasting are hard to do precisely. This paper discusses this obstacle in stochastic cohort-component population forecasts. The uncertainty of forecasts is due to uncertain estimates of the jump-off population and to errors in the forecasts of the vital rates. Empirically based of each source are presented and propagated through a simplified analytical model of population growth that allows assessment of the role of each component in the total error. Numerical estimates based on the errors of an actual vector ARIMA forecast of the US female population. These results broadly agree with those of the analytical model. This work especially uncertainty in the fertility forecasts to be so much higher than that in the other sources that the latter can be ignored in the propagation of error calculations for those cohorts that are born after the jump-off year of the forecast. A methodology is therefore presented which far simplifies the propagation of error calculations. It is noted, however, that the uncertainty of the jump-off population, migration, and mortality in the propagation of error for those alive at the jump-off time of the forecast must still be considered.

MeSH terms

  • Demography
  • Emigration and Immigration*
  • Fertility*
  • Forecasting*
  • Methods*
  • Models, Theoretical*
  • Mortality*
  • Population
  • Population Dynamics
  • Research
  • Statistics as Topic