Safety and efficacy of cutting balloon angioplasty: the Mayo Clinic experience

J Invasive Cardiol. 2002 Dec;14(12):720-4.

Abstract

A number of evolving clinical indications for cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) have been described in the clinical literature, including angioplasty-resistant stenoses, in-stent restenosis, ostial lesions and small vessel disease.

Methods: We analyzed the Mayo Clinic PTCA registry and report procedural and in-hospital clinical outcomes in 100 patients (103 procedures, 114 lesions) undergoing CBA.

Results: CBA was successfully completed in 109 lesions (96%). The majority of lesions (73%) required additional treatment with either balloon angioplasty (39%) or stent implantation (34%). Severe intimal dissection resulting in at least 50% luminal obstruction occurred in 13 lesions (11%). A single incident of branch occlusion was documented, resulting in ST elevation myocardial infarction. There were no incidents of vessel perforation, urgent percutaneous or surgical target vessel revascularization, or in-hospital death.

Conclusion: CBA is feasible and safe, with a low incidence of procedural complications and in-hospital adverse cardiac events when used primarily for in-stent restenosis.

MeSH terms

  • Academic Medical Centers
  • Aged
  • Angina, Unstable / diagnostic imaging
  • Angina, Unstable / therapy*
  • Angioplasty, Balloon / instrumentation*
  • Angioplasty, Balloon / methods
  • Coronary Angiography
  • Equipment Design
  • Equipment Safety
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Minnesota
  • Myocardial Infarction / diagnostic imaging
  • Myocardial Infarction / therapy*
  • Prognosis
  • Registries
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Stents*
  • Treatment Outcome