CHOP is superior to CNOP in elderly patients with aggressive lymphoma while outcome is unaffected by filgrastim treatment: results of a Nordic Lymphoma Group randomized trial

Blood. 2003 May 15;101(10):3840-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-10-3238. Epub 2003 Jan 16.

Abstract

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) during induction chemotherapy with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, prednisone) or CNOP (doxorubicin replaced with mitoxantrone) in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) improves time to treatment failure (TTF), complete remission (CR) rate, and overall survival (OS). Furthermore, the efficacy of CHOP versus CNOP chemotherapy was compared. A total of 455 previously untreated patients older than 60 years with stages II to IV aggressive NHL were included in the analysis. Patients (median age, 71 years; range, 60-86 years) were randomized to receive CHOP (doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2)) or CNOP (mitoxantrone 10 mg/m(2)) with or without G-CSF (5 microg/kg from day 2 until day 10-14 of each cycle every 3 weeks; 8 cycles). Forty-seven patients previously hospitalized for class I to II congestive heart failure were randomized to receive CNOP with or without G-CSF (not included in the CHOP versus CNOP analysis). The CR rates in the CHOP/CNOP plus G-CSF and CHOP/CNOP groups were the same, 52%, and in the CHOP with or without G-CSF and CNOP with or without G-CSF groups, 60% and 43% (P <.001), respectively. No benefit of G-CSF in terms of TTF and OS could be shown (P =.96 and P =.22, respectively), whereas CHOP was superior to CNOP (TTF/OS P <.001). The incidences of severe granulocytopenia (World Health Organization grade IV) and granulocytopenic infections were higher in patients not receiving G-CSF. The cumulative proportion of patients receiving 90% or more of allocated chemotherapy was higher (P <.05) in patients receiving G-CSF. Concomitant G-CSF treatment did not improve CR rate, TTF, or OS. Patients receiving CHOP fared better than those given CNOP chemotherapy. The addition of G-CSF reduces the incidence of severe granulocytopenia and infections in elderly patients with aggressive NHL receiving CHOP or CNOP chemotherapy.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / administration & dosage
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use*
  • Cyclophosphamide / administration & dosage
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Doxorubicin / administration & dosage
  • Female
  • Filgrastim
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor / therapeutic use*
  • Granulocytes
  • Humans
  • Leukocyte Count
  • Lymphoma / blood
  • Lymphoma / drug therapy*
  • Male
  • Mitoxantrone / administration & dosage
  • Prednisolone / administration & dosage
  • Prednisone / administration & dosage
  • Recombinant Proteins
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Vincristine / administration & dosage

Substances

  • Recombinant Proteins
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
  • Vincristine
  • Doxorubicin
  • Cyclophosphamide
  • Prednisolone
  • Mitoxantrone
  • Filgrastim
  • Prednisone

Supplementary concepts

  • CHOP protocol
  • MCOP protocol