Background: Costimulatory blockade has been shown to prevent acute rejection (AR) and promote long-term graft survival in a number of animal models including nonhuman primates. The effect of concomitant administration of conventional immunosuppressives on long-term liver allograft survival and intragraft expression of immune mediators has not previously been examined.
Materials and methods: A high-responding Dark Agouti to Lewis orthotopic liver transplant (LEW OLT) model was used to compare anti-CD154 alone, or in combination with cyclosporin (CyA) on allograft survival. Donor-specific reactivity was assessed by mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) and allogeneic skin grafts. Surviving rats were euthanized on day 150 and intragraft gene (CD80, 86, 152, 154, IFN-gamma, IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, IL-13, TNF-alpha, TGF-beta, IL-7, Fas-ligand, Granzyme B, bax, and bcl(2)) and protein (CD4, CD8, ED1, CD154, CD80, CD86) expression was measured.
Results: Untreated control recipients had a median survival time of 5 days. Recipients treated with anti-CD154 survived to beyond 150 days with no evidence of AR. Concomitant administration of CyA did not alter the long-term survival. There was no difference in the serum aspartate aminotransferase between treatment groups or a change over time. All treated recipients showed a reduction in donor-specific MLR at day 40 and 60 but had persistence of donor reactivity to skin grafts at day 100. Histologically, liver architecture was well preserved despite the presence of a nondestructive mononuclear cell infiltrate. Analysis of intragraft gene expression revealed an inverse relationship between the duration of anti-CD154 therapy and the gene expression of costimulatory molecules and Th1 cytokine transcripts. The pro-apoptotic gene, bax, was increased in recipients treated with anti-CD154, but not CyA, compared with normal liver.
Conclusions: These data demonstrate that anti-CD154 therapy either alone or in combination with CyA allows for the long-term survival of liver allografts in the rat despite there being a difference in the intragraft gene and protein profile.