Validity of self-assessed reports of occurrence and duration of occupational tasks

Ergonomics. 2005 Jan;48(1):12-24. doi: 10.1080/00140130412331293364.

Abstract

To obtain quantitative estimates of the physical workload in epidemiological and intervention studies of musculoskeletal disorders, there is a need to extend task based exposure data to job exposure profiles. For this purpose a work task diary was developed and evaluated. This was validated against direct observations of a day's work for twenty-two female office workers and twenty female hospital cleaners. There was a good agreement regarding the occurrence of the main tasks. However, the less time-consuming tasks were under-reported. Moreover, about two thirds of the changes between tasks were not reported. The difficulties of defining tasks that function as occupational entities seems to be a major reason for the lack of agreement. The underestimation of the duration of breaks/pauses was most pronounced for the cleaners. Still, the diary would be useful for the calculation of job exposure, by time-weighting task exposure data, when the tasks and/or their duration vary between days.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Ergometry
  • Female
  • Household Work
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Occupations*
  • Office Management
  • Self-Assessment
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Sweden
  • Task Performance and Analysis*
  • Workload