Transesophageal echocardiography in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of pulmonary vein stenosis after radiofrequency ablation therapy

J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005 Jun;18(6):654-9. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2004.10.002.

Abstract

Objective: Doppler-derived flow velocity measured by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) may overestimate pulmonary vein stenosis. We hypothesized that combining peak velocity with a stenotic flow pattern improves diagnosis compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods: TEE and MRI were performed in 44 patients 19 +/- 11 months after radiofrequency catheter ablation. Pulmonary vein stenosis was defined by a peak velocity of 110 cm/s or more plus a stenotic flow pattern (turbulence and reduced flow variation) on TEE and a lumen reduction of more than 50% on MRI.

Results: In all, 175 pulmonary veins were studied. MRI showed 7 cases of pulmonary vein stenosis that were correctly identified by TEE. In addition, TEE criteria for pulmonary vein stenosis were met in 4 pulmonary veins that did not show obstruction on MRI. In all, 5 pulmonary veins with normal appearance on MRI had peak velocity of 110 cm/s or more with normal flow pattern.

Conclusions: TEE Doppler measurements can be reliably used to detect or exclude significant pulmonary vein stenosis if the diagnosis is restricted to a combination of elevated peak velocity (> or = 110 cm/s) with turbulence and little flow variation.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Controlled Clinical Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Catheter Ablation / statistics & numerical data*
  • Echocardiography, Transesophageal / statistics & numerical data*
  • Female
  • Germany / epidemiology
  • Humans
  • Image Enhancement / methods*
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / statistics & numerical data*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prognosis
  • Pulmonary Veno-Occlusive Disease / diagnosis*
  • Pulmonary Veno-Occlusive Disease / epidemiology*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Risk Assessment / methods
  • Risk Factors
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Treatment Outcome