Race and ethnic differences and human figure drawings: clinical utility of the DAP:SPED

J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2005 Dec;34(4):706-11. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3404_12.

Abstract

This study examined race and ethnic differences on the Draw A Person: Screening Procedure for Emotional Disturbance (DAP:SPED; Naglieri, McNeish, & Bardos, 1991) for youths 6 though 17 years of age for 2 matched samples. Samples were drawn from the DAP:SPED nationally representative standardization sample and matched on gender, grade, and school classroom. No statistically significant differences were found for big figure, small figure, or shading item composites. A statistically significant difference was found between Black-White pairs on figure omissions but showed a small effect size (d value = .25). Further, no statistically significant differences were found between the DAP:SPED Total T scores for Black and White youth (M = 47.67, SD = 10.09; N =138) or Hispanic and White youth (M = 48.20, SD = 9.56; N = 59), showing very small effect sizes. In addition, equivalence testing showed similarities across race and ethnic pairs for all composites and DAP:SPED total score, lending preliminary support to the DAP:SPED's clinical utility as a measure that yields similar scores across these groups.

Publication types

  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Affective Symptoms / diagnosis*
  • Age Factors
  • Art*
  • Black People / psychology*
  • Body Image
  • Child
  • Female
  • Hispanic or Latino / psychology*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Psychometrics
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sex Factors
  • White People / psychology*