Maximal hemodynamic and ventilatory responses using cycle and treadmill ergometer were compared in 52 asymptomatic patients with angiographically proved coronary artery disease. Moreover, test sensitivity with respect to ST-segment depression and typical angina pectoris were compared between exercise modes used. Exercise tests were performed on different days in randomized order. In 42 patients, exercise-induced myocardial ischemia, expressed as a fraction of left ventricular circumference, was assessed by thallium-201 scintigraphy. The main finding of this study was a significantly higher maximal oxygen uptake (1.87 +/- 0.4 vs 2.2 +/- 0.5 liters/min; p less than 0.001), heart rate (148 +/- 19 vs 158 +/- 18 beats/min; p less than 0.001) and rate-pressure product (28.3 +/- 5 x 10(3) vs 30.7 +/- 5 x 10(3); p less than 0.001) during treadmill walking than during cycling. Therefore, stress-induced myocardial ischemia was significantly more extensive after treadmill walking (31 +/- 37 degrees vs 45 +/- 40 degrees; p less than 0.001). Moreover, there were significantly more patients with signs of myocardial ischemia (ST-segment depression or typical angina pectoris, or both) during treadmill than during cycle ergometry (35 vs 25 patients; p less than 0.05). However, lactate levels measured at peak exercise (4.07 +/- 2.0 vs 4.38 +/- 1.9 mmol/liter) and 3 minutes into the recovery period (5.60 +/- 2.2 vs 5.80 +/- 2.2 mmol/liter) were comparable between both methods, indicating no significant difference in anaerobic energy production. These findings suggest that walking on a treadmill represents an exercise method with a greater ability than cycling to detect coronary artery disease.