Oral immunotherapy with grass pollen in enterosoluble capsules. A prospective study of the clinical and immunological response

Eur J Pediatr. 1990 May;149(8):545-50. doi: 10.1007/BF01957689.

Abstract

In a prospective study spanning 2 years, 60 patients with grass pollen allergy were treated with either a low dose oral, a high dose oral or a subcutaneous hyposensitization regime. No significant improvement was seen in the orally treated patients whereas those on the subcutaneous hyposensitization regime demonstrated a decreased specific cutaneous reactivity, a rise in specific IgG antibodies and a reduction in symptoms. This study suggests that oral hyposensitization, even with enterosoluble grass pollen capsules, is ineffective.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Oral
  • Adolescent
  • Capsules
  • Child
  • Conjunctivitis, Allergic / therapy*
  • Delayed-Action Preparations
  • Desensitization, Immunologic*
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
  • Female
  • Histamine Release / immunology
  • Humans
  • Immunoglobulin E / analysis
  • Immunoglobulin G / analysis
  • Immunotherapy / methods*
  • Injections, Subcutaneous
  • Intestinal Absorption
  • Male
  • Poaceae / immunology
  • Pollen / immunology*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Severity of Illness Index

Substances

  • Capsules
  • Delayed-Action Preparations
  • Immunoglobulin G
  • Immunoglobulin E