Background: Partial hepatectomy (PH) and liver transplantation (LT) compete as first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A prospectively collected database was retrospectively reviewed to establish when PH can compete with LT.
Methods: Between 1991 and 2002, PH was performed in 131 cases of HCC (Child-Pugh A-B, technically resectable tumor without metastases). To ascertain patient survival after PH, we compared this series with a group of 40 HCC patients (G1-G2 HCC with no gross vascular invasion or metastasis) enlisted for liver transplantation during the same period.
Results: The 1-, 3-, and 5-year intention-to-treat survival rates were 75%, 52%, and 31% for resection and 89%, 71%, and 63% for transplantation. Two tumor-related variables (gross vascular invasion and histological grade) and three liver function parameters (Child-Pugh score, bilirubin, Okuda stage) proved to be independent predictors of survival after resection, whereas nodule size and number, and Milan criteria did not. The 5-year survival of the best candidates for resection (favorable tumor biology with very well preserved liver function, n = 52) was 58%. On a descriptive basis alone, this result did not differ significantly from the outcome in LT patients. PH patients with a poorly differentiated tumor and/or gross vascular invasion (n = 28) had the worst outcome, irrespective of their liver function parameters.
Conclusions: For technically resectable tumors without aggressive features (G3 or macroscopic vascular invasion), PH can only compete with LT, in terms of long-term survival, when patients with a well-preserved liver function are selected.