Nuchal translucency screening: how do women actually utilize the results?

Prenat Diagn. 2007 Feb;27(2):119-23. doi: 10.1002/pd.1617.

Abstract

Objective: To examine how women use the nuchal translucency (NT) risk adjustment in decision-making for invasive prenatal diagnosis.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study of 1083 consecutive NT screening exams. A screen-positive test was defined as a risk > or = 1/300. Primary outcome was what proportion of screen-positive or screen-negative women chose to undergo chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis.

Results: Of the women tested, 79% (858/1083) were > or = 35-years-old and 88% (756/858) of these women had a decrease in age-related risk after NT. Of the screen-negative women, 31% (238/756) > or = 35 years of age chose to have invasive testing as compared to only 11.2% (25/223) of those < 35 years of age (p < 0.001). Of the screen-positive women, 71% (72/102) > or = 35 years of age and 100% (2/2) < 35 years of age chose to obtain invasive testing (p = 0.368).

Conclusion: First-trimester NT screening for Down syndrome (DS) enables a significant number of women over age 35 to lower the risk for DS several fold and avoid the risks of invasive testing. However, despite significant reductions in age-specific mid-trimester DS risks, a relatively high proportion of women > or = 35 years of age still opted for invasive testing.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Amniocentesis
  • Choice Behavior*
  • Chorionic Villi Sampling
  • Cohort Studies
  • Down Syndrome / diagnosis*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Nuchal Translucency Measurement / psychology*
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Trimester, First*
  • Pregnancy, High-Risk
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors