Patient understanding of research: developing and testing of a new questionnaire

Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2007 Mar;16(2):187-95; quiz 195-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2006.00732.x.

Abstract

Lack of understanding or knowledge of research among patients participating in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is common. However, there is a lack of validated measures to assess the extent of the problem. The aim of this study was to develop and pilot a questionnaire to assess knowledge and understanding of RCTs in the cancer setting. A 13-item four-part questionnaire was developed and piloted with three groups: patients with cancer who had no experience of clinical trials (n=26); patients with cancer who had previously participated in an RCT (n=26) and research nurses (n=26). The groups were compared using non-parametric anova techniques which showed a highly statistically significant difference between the nurses and both patient groups (P<0.001). The difference between the patient groups was not significant (P=0.231). Cronbach's alpha was computed at 0.77. After studying correlation of individual questions and verbatim comments from respondents, one question was removed from the questionnaire, but this did not have a major effect on the properties of the tool. Minor changes were made to six other questions and the revised tool will now be used and further tested in a large randomized controlled trial to improve informed consent in trial participation.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Comprehension*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Informed Consent
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasms / psychology*
  • Pilot Projects
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires / standards*