Controlling for occasion-specific effects when assessing the test-retest reliability of self-report health questionnaires

Qual Life Res. 2007 Oct;16(8):1399-405. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9246-9. Epub 2007 Jul 31.

Abstract

Objective: This study proposes a method for self-report health questionnaires to adjust test-retest reliability for changes during the test-retest interval based on an external measure, and to distinguish such changes from random response errors.

Methods: In our application, eighty participants completed the Symptoms of Illness Checklist (SIC) on two occasions, two weeks apart, immediately before interviews given on each occasion by one of two physicians in a crossover design. The physician interview scores served as external measures, and structural equation modeling was used to estimate the parameters of a model that corrected for the occasion-specific effect of participants' responses using information from the interviews.

Results: Correcting for changes in symptoms during the test-retest interval increased SIC test-retest reliability from .744 to .804 and significantly improved model fit (chi2(diff)(1) = 30.78, p < .001).

Conclusions: The results suggest methods that can improve the evaluation of self-report health questionnaire test-retest reliability by identifying changes using an external measure, and distinguishing these from random response errors; these increased the estimated SIC test-retest reliability and indicated that the SIC was indeed able to measure changes over the studied time interval. This method can be applied across a broad range of questionnaires.

Publication types

  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Health Status Indicators*
  • Health Status*
  • Humans
  • Models, Theoretical
  • Psychological Tests
  • Psychometrics
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sickness Impact Profile
  • Surveys and Questionnaires