The impact of maternal negative affectivity and general self-efficacy on breastfeeding: the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study

J Pediatr. 2008 Jan;152(1):68-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.06.005. Epub 2007 Oct 24.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the degree to which mothers' prepartum personality traits predict breastfeeding status at 6 months postpartum.

Study design: This prospective cohort study is part of the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study, conducted at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health. A total of 27,753 mothers completed assessment of negative affectivity (NA) and general self-efficacy (GSE) at gestation weeks 17 and 30 and completed a questionnaire about infant feeding at 6 months postpartum. Feeding status was classified with a cutoff at 6 months in the categories of predominant breastfeeding, mixed breastfeeding, and bottle-feeding.

Results: After adjusting for maternal smoking, age, education, cesarean section, preterm birth, primiparity, and external daycare, NA increased the odds of mixed breastfeeding (odds ratio [OR], 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.32) and bottle feeding (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.53) compared with predominant breastfeeding. GSE decreased the odds of bottle feeding (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84 to 0.97) but not of mixed breastfeeding (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.04) compared with predominant breastfeeding. The adjusting variables were also predictors of breastfeeding behavior in their own right.

Conclusions: Our results show that NA and GSE are important antenatal predictors of breastfeeding status at 6 months postpartum.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Affect*
  • Bottle Feeding
  • Breast Feeding / psychology*
  • Breast Feeding / statistics & numerical data*
  • Cohort Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Negativism*
  • Norway / epidemiology
  • Odds Ratio
  • Personality Assessment
  • Postnatal Care
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prospective Studies
  • Research Design
  • Risk Factors
  • Self Efficacy*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires