While recent research has focused on the effects of exotic plant species on ecosystem properties, less is known about how restoring individual native plant species, differing in biomass and tissue chemistry, may impact ecosystems. We examined how three native C(4) prairie grasses affected soil C and N cycling 11 years after reintroduction into successional old-field communities dominated by non-native C(3) grasses. The species examined in this study differ in traits that are expected to influence soil C and N cycling (biomass and tissue chemistry). Thus, we hypothesized that cycling rates would decrease, thereby increasing pool sizes in soils under C(4) species compared under C(3) species. As predicted, the C(4) species had greater biomass and more recalcitrant tissue [higher C:N, acid detergent fiber (ADF):N] compared to the dominant C(3) species. The three C(4) species did not differ in tissue C:N, ADF:N, or root biomass, but Andropogon had more than twice the shoot biomass of Schizachyrium and Sorghastrum. Soils under the C(4) species did not differ in inorganic N levels, but levels were lower than in soils under the C(3) species, and soils under Andropogon had slightly lower in situ net N mineralization rates compared to those under C(3) species. We found little evidence of larger surface soil C pools under C(4) species versus C(3) species after 11 years and no differences in subsurface soil C or N among species. The C(4) species contributed a significant amount of C to both soil depths after 11 years. Our results demonstrate that C(4) species reintroduction into old-fields can alter C and N cycling on relatively short timescales, and that individual C(4) species differ in the magnitude of these effects. Improving our understanding of how species influence ecosystem properties is essential to predicting the ecosystem-level consequences of plant community alterations due to land use changes, global change, and species introductions.