Assessment of acute otitis externa and otitis media with effusion performance measures in otolaryngology practices

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Oct;139(4):490-494. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.07.030.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the acute otitis externa and otitis media with effusion performance measure sets in a clinical setting and provide preliminary data on measure compliance.

Study design and setting: Quality improvement study.

Subjects and methods: Convenience sampling (N = 84) was performed at five sites of ENT and Allergy Associates, LLC.

Results: Physicians reported prescribing topical antibiotic preparations and assessing for auricular or periauricular pain in 98% of acute otitis externa cases (N = 55). In addition, 87% did not prescribe systemic antimicrobials. Pneumatic otoscopy was used by 76% of physicians as a method for otitis media with effusion diagnosis and 10% administered a hearing test within 6 months before tympanostomy tube placement (N = 29). Furthermore, as recommended, 86% did not prescribe decongestants or antihistamines whereas 93% and 90% did not prescribe antimicrobials or systemic steroids, respectively.

Conclusion: Although compliance in this study was generally high across both measure sets, actual use of the face sheet forms for appropriate patients was lower than the 80% reporting mandate by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services that allows physicians to receive the monetary bonus. Incentive-based reporting should be continuously investigated to assess challenges for evaluating current measures.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Acoustic Impedance Tests
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / administration & dosage
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Humans
  • Otitis Externa* / diagnosis
  • Otitis Externa* / drug therapy
  • Otitis Media with Effusion* / diagnosis
  • Otitis Media with Effusion* / drug therapy
  • Otoscopy
  • Pilot Projects
  • Quality of Health Care

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents