Diagnostic cerebral angiography: the interventional neurology perspective

J Neuroimaging. 2010 Jul;20(3):251-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2008.00356.x. Epub 2009 Feb 13.

Abstract

Background/objective: Cerebral angiography (CA) is increasingly used in clinical practice with advances in neurointerventional therapy. We present our CA experience performed by neurologists at an academic institution.

Method: CA performed between July 2005 and March 2008 was reviewed. Major neurological outcome was defined as a new neurological deficit lasting >24 hours or worsening of pre-existing neurological deficit by 4 points on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Major non-neurological outcomes were defined as any death within 24 hours of the procedure, vascular injury requiring surgery, arteriovenous fistula, or pseudo-aneurysm formation and access site hematoma >5 cm, and/or requiring blood transfusion.

Results: In total 661 angiograms were performed over 30 months. CA indications were ischemic stroke in 210/661 (31.7%), hemorrhagic stroke in 321/661 (48.6%), trauma for 16/661 (2.4%), presurgical epilepsy workup 95/661 (14.3%), and other conditions 19/661 (2.9%). Mean age of the group was 49 +/- 18 years. Permanent neurological deficit occurred in .2% (1 patient) and reversible neurological deficits occurred in .2% (1/661). Major non-neurological complications occurred in .9% (6/661). All these rates were less than established guidelines.

Conclusions: The safety and efficacy of CA performed by interventional neurologists is acceptable by current guidelines.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Brain Injuries / diagnostic imaging*
  • Brain Ischemia / diagnostic imaging*
  • Cerebral Angiography / methods*
  • Databases, Factual
  • Epilepsy / diagnostic imaging*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Stroke / diagnostic imaging*