Should we use laparoscopic adrenalectomy for metastases? Scandinavian multicenter study

J Surg Oncol. 2009 Jul 1;100(1):43-7. doi: 10.1002/jso.21293.

Abstract

Introduction: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for metastases is considered controversial. Multicenter retrospective study was performed to gain new knowledge in this issue.

Materials and methods: From January 1997 till November 2008, 41 adrenalectomies were performed during follow-up of the patients operated for malignant tumors. The median age was 64 (52-77) years. Metastases were confirmed in 31/41 cases. Metastatic lesions were further studied and to define factors influencing on survival, patients were divided to sub-groups of metachronous/synchronous, tumor origin and tumor size.

Results: The median operative time was 104 (50-230) min, the median blood loss was 100 (0-500) ml. One procedure (3.2%) was converted. There were 3 (10.7%) intraoperative and 2 (7.4%) postoperative complications. The median tumor size was 6 (1.5-16) cm. Pathohistological analysis revealed 12 colorectal, 9 renal cell carcinoma, 5 lung carcinoma, 4 melanoma, and 1 hepatocellular metastases. The resection margin was not free in one case (3.7%). The median hospital stay was 2 (1-21) days. The median length of survival was 29 +/- 2.1 months for all patients.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for metastases is feasible regardless of their sizes. However these procedures should be performed by highly skilled laparoscopic surgeon in a fully equipped operating room and with a coordinated operation team.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Adrenal Gland Neoplasms / mortality
  • Adrenal Gland Neoplasms / pathology
  • Adrenal Gland Neoplasms / secondary*
  • Adrenal Gland Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Adrenalectomy / methods*
  • Aged
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy / methods*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Retrospective Studies