How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009 Jun;119(6):443-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01388.x.

Abstract

Objective: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are increasingly frequently used in the evaluation of medical treatments. This review explains the principles of the methodology, significance and limitations of systematic reviews.

Method: Short review article.

Results: In contrast to conventional reviews, systematic reviews use a structured approach in retrieving, analyzing and interpreting the evidence. A comprehensive search strategy is applied to identify all relevant trials. Study selection and data extraction is performed independently by at least two reviewers. The data are usually synthesized in a meta-analysis applying statistical methods to examine homogeneity. Funnel plots and other statistical methods are applied to detect publication bias.

Conclusion: Due to the enormous amount of scientific information published every year, systematic reviews and meta-analyses have become indispensable methods for the evaluation of medical treatments.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Bibliometrics
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
  • Humans
  • Journal Impact Factor
  • Meta-Analysis as Topic*
  • Publication Bias
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Review Literature as Topic*
  • Statistics as Topic
  • Terminology as Topic