Objectives: To establish construct validity of an anatomic model as a simulator for myringotomy with ventilation tube insertion and to assess its subjective appeal.
Study design: Cross-sectional, repeated-measures comparative evaluation of simulator.
Setting: University academic otolaryngology residency program.
Subjects and methods: Using an anatomic model of the human auricle, ear canal, eardrum, and middle ear space, 18 otolaryngologists of various levels of training performed 10 timed procedures: myringotomy with ventilation tube insertion. Errors were recorded, and participants reported the quality of their experience.
Results: Both time-to-completion and errors per trial discriminated novices from non-novice participants; novices (02:23, 95% confidence interval [CI], 01:42-03:04) were 3.6 times slower than non-novices (00:39, 95% CI, 00:35-00:43) and 6.5 times more error prone (novices 2.16 errors/trial, 95% CI, 1.68-2.64; non-novices 0.33 errors/trial, 95% CI, 0.21-0.45). Errors were strongly correlated with prior surgical experience. All participants required more time to complete the first trial, and their performance stabilized thereafter. Overall, the simulation was perceived as a valuable experience.
Conclusion: Our model is a valid platform for simulating myringotomy with ventilation tube insertion. The model discriminates novices from non-novices, has a learning curve, and is perceived to be a valuable and realistic teaching tool by users.