American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletins: original versus revised

Am J Perinatol. 2010 Sep;27(8):611-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1249363. Epub 2010 Mar 1.

Abstract

We compared the types (A, B, or C) of recommendations and levels (I, II, III, or others) of references in the original versus revised practice bulletins (PBs). American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) compendiums and Web site were used to obtain the PBs. Chi-square test for trend or Wilcoxon matched-pairs tests were used. From December 1998 to December 2008, ACOG published 78 PBs, of which 24% (19) have been revised. Neither the median numbers of recommendations per PB (8 to 10; P = 0.235) nor the type ( P = 0.155) increased significantly. Additionally, the level of references ( P = 0.130) and the type of journals they were published in did not vary significantly ( P = 0.554). In 10 years, approximately one in four PBs has been revised and the number of recommendations per PB has increased, but the types of suggestions and level of references has not improved appreciably.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Education, Medical, Continuing / methods
  • Education, Medical, Continuing / organization & administration*
  • Gynecology* / education
  • Health Planning Guidelines
  • Humans
  • Medical Informatics / standards
  • Obstetrics* / education
  • Periodicals as Topic
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic* / standards