An anatomic-based approach for the placement of implantable loop recorders

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010 Sep;33(9):1149-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02747.x.

Abstract

Introduction: Placement of the Reveal implantable loop recorder (ILR; Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) has previously involved preoperative cutaneous mapping to determine the optimal location. We describe an anatomic-based approach to ILR placement that does not require cutaneous mapping.

Method: A total of 63 patients (40 women, 23 men, mean age 38 ± 15 years) were included in the study. Each underwent implantation of a Reveal ILR in the left upper chest area midway between the supraclavicular notch and the left breast area. Thirty-two patients received a Medtronic Reveal DX ILR and 31 received Reveal XT device.

Results: In all 62 patients, adequate electrocardiographic tracings were obtained at implant without the need for preoperative cutaneous mapping, and all were followed for a period of 10 ± 4 months afterwards. The mean P wave amplitude was 0.12 ± 0.20 mV at implant and at follow-up (6-14 months postimplant); the amplitude was 0.11 ± 0.19 mV. The peak-to-peak QRS amplitude was 0.48 ± 0.15 mV at implant and 0.44 ± 0.16 mV at a follow-up of 6-14 months. The P waves were not detected in two patients at follow-up. In one patient, decreased amplitude of QRS complex resulted in the autoactivation of the device and in one other patient noise was inappropriately oversensed and recorded.

Conclusion: A simple anatomic approach can be used for reveal ILR placement.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Clavicle / anatomy & histology*
  • Electrocardiography, Ambulatory / instrumentation*
  • Electrocardiography, Ambulatory / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care
  • Prosthesis Implantation / instrumentation*
  • Prosthesis Implantation / methods*
  • Syncope / diagnosis*
  • Thorax / anatomy & histology*
  • Young Adult