Minimally invasive living donor nephrectomy - introduction of hand-assistance

Abstract

Conventional open living donor nephrectomy (LDN) technique is perceived as a barrier for expanding living donor programmes. Thus, minimal invasive surgery techniques have been advocated to overcome this hurdle. The aim of this study was to evaluate our experience on minimally invasive LDN. During the last decade we have gradually expanded the use of minimally invasive LDN with various techniques; strictly laparoscopic versus hand-assisted, and laparoscopic versus retroperitoneoscopic. This study is based on 305 consecutive minimally invasive LDN's, from 1998 to 2009. By multiple regression analysis, minimally invasive hand-assisted technique was shown to be associated with a significantly lower risk of major complications and intraoperative incidents, as well as reduced warm ischemia and operative time. In our opinion, the introduction of hand-assisted technique is probably the most significant single factor for improved results, although accumulated experience and developments in equipment will contribute. Our experience indicates that learning curves are facilitated by the use of hand-assisted technique. Improvements in surgical outcomes following donor nephrectomy may enhance living donor programmes.