Purpose of review: Prevention of postoperative stress urinary incontinence at the time of prolapse repair is controversial. There has been a shift away from colposuspension procedures to midurethral slings. As with any surgery, midurethral slings are associated with risks, which must be balanced against the benefits of preventing postoperative stress urinary incontinence. The aim of this overview is to review the controversy, discuss potential complications of midurethral slings, discuss the efficacy of concomitant sling placement, and suggest a method of systematically approaching patients with high-grade anterior compartment prolapse.
Recent findings: Several studies have recently advocated for the routine use of anti-incontinence procedures at the time of prolapse surgery; however, applying these data to midurethral slings is problematic. Ultimately, the issue of treatment of the urethra at the time of prolapse repair should be discussed with the patient with treatment rendered depending on the risk the patient is willing to bear.
Summary: The aim of this study is to discuss the risks and benefits of applying a midurethral sling in patients with high-grade anterior compartment prolapse. In these patients, placement of a suburethral sling may be approached systematically, taking into account the patients' variables and their own goals of therapy.