Comparison of root resorption between self-ligating and conventional preadjusted brackets using cone beam computed tomography

Angle Orthod. 2012 Nov;82(6):1078-82. doi: 10.2319/080911-501.1. Epub 2012 Mar 12.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the magnitude of external apical root resorption (EARR) of incisors in patients undergoing the initial phase of orthodontic treatment with two sets of brackets.

Materials and methods: According to the results of the power analysis for sample size calculation, 19 Angle Class I patients (anterior crowding: 3 to 5 mm; mean age: 20.6 years) were included in the study and randomly divided into two groups: group I (n = 11, self-ligating brackets) and group II (n = 8, conventional preadjusted brackets). The degree of EARR was detected in 152 upper and lower incisors by using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans and a three-dimensional program (Dolphin 11.5, Dolphin Imaging & Management Solutions, Chatsworth, Calif) with 25% level of sensitivity. The CBCT scans were obtained before (T1) and 6 months after initiation of treatment (T2). Differences between and within groups were analyzed by nonpaired and paired t-test, respectively, with 5% significance level.

Results: Significant differences were found for both groups between T1 and T2. However, no differences in the degree of EARR were detected between the groups studied.

Conclusions: Although EARR has occurred in all teeth evaluated, the bracket design (self-ligating or conventional) did not demonstrate any influence on the results observed.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Child
  • Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Malocclusion, Angle Class I / diagnostic imaging
  • Malocclusion, Angle Class I / therapy*
  • Orthodontic Appliance Design
  • Orthodontic Brackets / adverse effects*
  • Orthodontics, Corrective / methods*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Root Resorption / diagnostic imaging
  • Root Resorption / etiology*