Antiplatelet therapy is more effective than anticoagulation for the prevention of noncardioembolic ischaemic stroke. The choice of antiplatelet regimen, however, remains contentious. Recent controversies regarding aspirin resistance and the optimal dosing of aspirin, as well as recognition of the variable bioactivation of clopidogrel, have added further confusion to the debate. The American Heart Association (AHA) and American Stroke Association (ASA) recently released their third joint guideline in the past 5 years on secondary stroke prevention. The European Stroke Organisation has published three guidelines on this issue since 2000. These frequent updates have been necessary because of rapidly accumulating data from clinical trials. Careful consideration of the sometimes confusing trial results reveals that the 2011 AHA-ASA guidelines are correct in no longer specifying a 'preferred' antiplatelet regimen from among the choices recently studied. This recommendation does not, however, mean that all antiplatelet regimens should be considered equal. This Review discusses the various antiplatelet regimens, and the trials that led to the rapid evolution of the guidelines for secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke.