Predictors of resectability in breast-conserving therapy

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Oct;286(4):1023-31. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2401-8. Epub 2012 Jun 17.

Abstract

Background: Our goal is to identify subgroups of women undergoing breast-conserving therapy (BCT) who are at increased risk for requiring a secondary surgical procedure, and to identify tumor and patient profiles that will allow surgeons to anticipate the need for taking larger margins when removing the tumor.

Methods: One hundred female patients who had palpable, invasive carcinomas of the breast, and had undergone a primary BCT, were included in the study. Of these, all women (n = 25) who had incomplete resections, or questionable margins of resection, had to undergo re-excisions.

Results: Patients who had multifocal disease, accompanying ductal carcinoma in situ, involvement of regional lymph nodes, high-grade breast cancer (Grade 3 vs. 1/2), lympho-vascular invasion or negative hormone-receptor-status, were significantly more likely to have undergone incomplete removal of tumor tissue-these patients thus required a secondary surgery.

Conclusion: The clinical and pathological predictors described above indicate that surgery in breast cancer patients meeting these criteria require larger safety margins to minimize the incidence rate of re-excision at a later date.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Breast / pathology
  • Breast Neoplasms / pathology
  • Breast Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Carcinoma / pathology
  • Carcinoma / surgery*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Mastectomy, Segmental*
  • Middle Aged
  • Regression Analysis