Conformational pulsatile changes of the aortic annulus: impact on prosthesis sizing by computed tomography for transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to investigate pulsatile changes of the aortic annulus and their impact on prosthesis selection by computed tomography (CT).

Background: Precise noninvasive prosthesis sizing is a prerequisite for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Methods: A total of 110 patients with severe aortic stenosis (mean age: 82.9 ± 8 years, mean aortic valve area: 0.69 ± 0.18 cm(2)) underwent electrocardiogram-gated CT. Aortic annulus dimensions were planimetrically quantified as area-derived diameter (D(A) = 2 ×✓(CSA/π), where CSA is the cross-sectional area) and perimeter-derived diameter (D(P) = P/π, where P is the length of the perimeter) in 5% increments of the RR interval. Hypothetical prosthesis sizing was based on D(A) and D(P) (23-mm prosthesis for <22 mm; 26 mm: 22 to 25 mm; 29 mm: >25 mm) and compared between maximum and traditional cardiac CT reconstruction phases at 35% and 75% of RR. Agreement for prosthesis selection was calculated by κ statistics.

Results: D(A) and D(P) were increased and eccentricity was reduced during systole, with D(A-MAX) and D(P-MAX) most often observed at 20% of RR. D(P) was consistently larger than D(A). Average net differences were 2.0 ± 0.6 mm and 1.7 ± 0.5 mm by D(A-MIN) versus D(A-MAX) and D(P-MIN) versus D(P-MAX). Agreement for prosthesis sizing was found in 93 of 110 patients (κ = 0.75) by D(A-75%) and in 80 of 110 patients (κ = 0.53) by D(A-MAX) compared with D(A-35%); and in 94 of 110 patients (κ = 0.73) by D(P-75%) and in 93 of 110 patients (κ = 0.73) by D(P-MAX) compared with D(P-35%). With sizing by D(A-75%) or D(P-75%), nominal prosthesis diameter was smaller than D(A-MAX) or D(P-MAX) in 15 and 6 patients respectively.

Conclusions: Aortic annulus morphology exhibits conformational pulsatile changes throughout the cardiac cycle due to deformation and stretch. These changes affect prosthesis selection. Prosthesis selection by diastolic perimeter- or area-derived dimensions harbors the risk of undersizing.