Neurocognitive features in subgroups of bipolar disorder

Bipolar Disord. 2013 May;15(3):272-83. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12061. Epub 2013 Mar 25.

Abstract

Objective: To examine which subgroups of DSM-IV bipolar disorder (BD) [BD type I (BD-I) or BD type II (BD-II), and subgroups based on history of psychosis, presenting polarity, and age at onset] differentiate best regarding neurocognitive measures.

Methods: A total of 199 patients with BD were characterized by clinical and neurocognitive features. The distribution of subgroups in this sample was: BD-I, 64% and BD-II, 36%; 60% had a history of psychosis; 57% had depression as the presenting polarity; 61% had an early onset of BD, 25% had a mid onset, and 14% had a late onset. We used multivariate regression analyses to assess relationships between neurocognitive variables and clinical subgroups.

Results: Both BD-I diagnosis and elevated presenting polarity were related to impairments in verbal memory, with elevated presenting polarity explaining more of the variance in this cognitive domain (22.5%). History of psychosis and BD-I diagnosis were both related to impairment in semantic fluency, with history of psychosis explaining more of the variance (11.6%).

Conclusion: Poor performance in verbal memory appears to be associated with an elevated presenting polarity, and poor performance in semantic fluency appears to be associated with a lifetime history of psychosis.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Age of Onset
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Bipolar Disorder / classification*
  • Bipolar Disorder / complications*
  • Cognition Disorders / diagnosis
  • Cognition Disorders / etiology*
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  • Humans
  • Memory Disorders / diagnosis
  • Memory Disorders / etiology*
  • Neuropsychological Tests
  • Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
  • Psychotic Disorders / etiology
  • Regression Analysis
  • Verbal Learning / physiology