Psychometric properties and concurrent validity of the CRAFFT among Norwegian adolescents. Ung@hordaland, a population-based study

Addict Behav. 2013 Oct;38(10):2500-5. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 May 9.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to examine the psychometric properties of the CRAFFT-questionnaire, and its concurrent validity with self-reported measures of alcohol consumption and illicit drug use ever among Norwegian adolescents. This study employs data from the ung@hordaland survey (N=9680). The concurrent validity of the CRAFFT-questionnaire was examined both as a case-finder with different cut-offs, but also as an ordinal scale. The ordinal scale was constructed by counting the number of affirmative responses from 0 to 6. Current self-reported excessive alcohol consumption, frequent binge drinking and any illicit drug use ever were employed as concurrent validity measures. The internal reliability of CRAFFT was adequate, and there was a linear relationship between CRAFFT-score and excessive alcohol consumption, frequent binge drinking and illicit drug use ever for both genders. Overall, this study shows a good concurrent validity and adequate psychometric properties of the CRAFFT-questionnaire. There results indicate, however, that the use of CRAFFT as a case-finder needs further research, as a suitable cut-point was difficult to determine. The authors conclude that in a clinical setting one positive answer is enough to warrant further investigation, and for research purposes the use of the questionnaire as an ordinal scale or using a cut-point of 2 might be preferable.

Keywords: Adolescence; Alcohol problems; CRAFFT; Drug use; Screening; Validation.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adolescent Behavior / psychology
  • Alcohol Drinking / epidemiology*
  • Binge Drinking / epidemiology*
  • Humans
  • Mass Screening / methods*
  • Norway / epidemiology
  • Psychometrics
  • Reference Standards
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Self Report
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Substance-Related Disorders / epidemiology*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires / standards*