Utility of minimum F-wave latencies compared with F-estimates and absolute reference values in S1 radiculopathies: are they still needed?

Muscle Nerve. 2014 Jun;49(6):809-13. doi: 10.1002/mus.23992. Epub 2014 Jan 31.

Abstract

Introduction: The utility of F-waves in assessing radiculopathies is debated. The aim of this study is to determine the frequency of abnormal minimum tibial F-wave latencies compared to an F-estimate and an absolute reference value in patients with electromyography (EMG) confirmed S1 radiculopathies.

Methods: A retrospective review of F-waves in patients with an EMG-confirmed isolated S1 radiculopathy was performed. The minimum and mean latencies of 8 tibial F-waves were compared with the calculated F-estimate and to an absolute reference value, and the frequencies of abnormal responses were determined.

Results: Of the 50 patients with an S1 radiculopathy, 4% had prolongation of the minimum reproducible F-wave latency, and 8% had prolongation of the mean latency relative to the calculated F-estimate.

Conclusions: The minimum and mean F-wave latencies are infrequently abnormal when compared with an estimated F-wave latency in S1 radiculopathies and are insensitive in the assessment of S1 nerve root injury.

Keywords: F-waves; electromyography; latency; nerve conduction studies; radiculopathy.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Electrodiagnosis / methods*
  • Electrodiagnosis / statistics & numerical data
  • Electromyography / methods
  • Electrophysiology / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neural Conduction / physiology*
  • Radiculopathy / diagnosis*
  • Radiculopathy / physiopathology*
  • Reaction Time / physiology*
  • Reference Values
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Tibial Nerve / physiopathology*
  • Time Factors
  • Young Adult