Development and validation of the Good Outcome Following Attempted Resuscitation (GO-FAR) score to predict neurologically intact survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation

JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Nov 11;173(20):1872-8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.10037.

Abstract

Importance: Informing patients and providers of the likelihood of survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), neurologically intact or with minimal deficits, may be useful when discussing do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders.

Objective: To develop a simple prearrest point score that can identify patients unlikely to survive IHCA, neurologically intact or with minimal deficits.

Design, setting, and participants: The study included 51,240 inpatients experiencing an index episode of IHCA between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2009, in 366 hospitals participating in the Get With the Guidelines-Resuscitation registry. Dividing data into training (44.4%), test (22.2%), and validation (33.4%) data sets, we used multivariate methods to select the best independent predictors of good neurologic outcome, created a series of candidate decision models, and used the test data set to select the model that best classified patients as having a very low (<1%), low (1%-3%), average (>3%-15%), or higher than average (>15%) likelihood of survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation for IHCA with good neurologic status. The final model was evaluated using the validation data set.

Main outcomes and measures: Survival to discharge after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation for IHCA with good neurologic status (neurologically intact or with minimal deficits) based on a Cerebral Performance Category score of 1.

Results: The best performing model was a simple point score based on 13 prearrest variables. The C statistic was 0.78 when applied to the validation set. It identified the likelihood of a good outcome as very low in 9.4% of patients (good outcome in 0.9%), low in 18.9% (good outcome in 1.7%), average in 54.0% (good outcome in 9.4%), and above average in 17.7% (good outcome in 27.5%). Overall, the score can identify more than one-quarter of patients as having a low or very low likelihood of survival to discharge, neurologically intact or with minimal deficits after IHCA (good outcome in 1.4%).

Conclusions and relevance: The Good Outcome Following Attempted Resuscitation (GO-FAR) scoring system identifies patients who are unlikely to benefit from a resuscitation attempt should they experience IHCA. This information can be used as part of a shared decision regarding do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders.

Publication types

  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / mortality*
  • Cognition Disorders / etiology
  • Decision Support Systems, Clinical*
  • Decision Support Techniques*
  • Female
  • Forecasting
  • Heart Arrest / complications
  • Heart Arrest / diagnosis
  • Heart Arrest / mortality
  • Heart Arrest / therapy*
  • Hospitalization
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Nervous System Diseases / etiology
  • Prognosis
  • Registries*
  • Resuscitation Orders
  • Treatment Failure
  • United States / epidemiology