Evaluation of cost-utility in middle ear implantation in the 'Nordic School': a multicenter study in Sweden and Norway

Acta Otolaryngol. 2014 Jan;134(1):19-25. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2013.834459. Epub 2013 Nov 21.

Abstract

Conclusion: Hearing restoration using an active middle ear implant (AMEI) is a highly cost-effective treatment for a selected group of patients with no other possibilities for auditory rehabilitation.

Objectives: To evaluate the cost-utility of using an AMEI for hearing rehabilitation.

Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter, single-subject repeated study in six tertiary referral centers. Twenty-four patients with sensorineural (SNHL), conductive (CHL), and mixed hearing loss (MHL) were implanted with the AMEI Vibrant Soundbridge® (VSB) for medical reasons. All patients were previously rehabilitated with conventional hearing aids. Multiple validated quality of life patient questionnaires, Health Utilities Index (HUI 2 and 3), and Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile (GHABP) were used to determine the utility gain and quality adjusted life years (QALY). Directly related treatment costs for the implantation were calculated and related to utility gain and QALY.

Results: The cost/QALY for patients with SNHL was estimated at €7260/QALY, and for patients with C/MHL at €12 503/QALY.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Hearing Loss / economics
  • Hearing Loss / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Norway
  • Ossicular Prosthesis / economics*
  • Ossicular Replacement / economics*
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Prospective Studies
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years
  • Sweden