Objective: To study differences in ultrasound-based compared to menstrual-based term estimation in women with type 1 diabetes.
Design: Nationwide register study.
Setting: Norway.
Population: Deliveries in Norway 1999-2004 by women registered in the Norwegian Childhood Diabetes Registry (n = 342) and the background population (n = 307 248), with data on both ultrasound-based and menstrual-based gestational age notified in the Birth Registry of Norway. Births with major malformations were excluded.
Methods: Linkage of two nationwide registries, the Medical Birth Registry of Norway and the Norwegian Childhood Diabetes Registry.
Main outcome measures: Estimated gestational age at delivery based on routine second trimester ultrasound measurements and last menstrual period.
Results: In women with type 1 diabetes, the distribution of gestational age at delivery was shifted considerably towards a lower gestational age when using second trimester ultrasound data for estimation, compared with last menstrual period data. The difference between the two estimation methods was larger among women with type 1 diabetes, although also evident in the general population. One in four women with diabetes and a certain last menstrual period date had their ultrasound-calculated term postponed 1 week or more, while one in 10 had it postponed 2 weeks or more. Corresponding numbers in the background population were one in five and one in 20.
Conclusions: We found a systematic postponement of ultrasound-based compared with menstrual-based term estimation in women with type 1 diabetes. Relying solely on routine ultrasound-based term calculation for delivery decision may imply a risk of going beyond an optimal pregnancy length.
Keywords: Type 1 diabetes; gestational length; last menstrual period; pregnancy; ultrasound.
© 2014 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.