Cigarette smoking and p300 amplitude in adults: a systematic review

Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Sep;16(9):1157-66. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu083. Epub 2014 May 20.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the association between chronic tobacco cigarette smoking and P300 amplitude.

Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Data sources: Medline, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PsychInfo, and Web of Science.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Eligible studies contained P300 amplitudes obtained from either visual or auditory stimuli and standard deviations or errors in female and male subjects older than 18 years in a group of nonabstaining chronic cigarette smokers and a nonsmoking control group.

Results: The 9 eligible studies comprised 13 relevant datasets containing 1,956 current cigarette smokers and 2,194 nonsmoking controls (N = 4,150). The P300 amplitude was smaller in cigarette smokers than in nonsmoking controls (Hedges' g effect size = .365; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.196-0.534, p < .001). Meta-regression showed significant positive associations between the number of cigarettes smoked per day at the time of the study (slope estimate = .036, 95% CI = 0.016-0.056, p ≤ .001, length of smoking in years (slope estimate = .056, 95% CI = 0.005-0.102, p = .018), pack years (slope estimate = .018, 95% CI = 0.009-0.031 p = .009), and age (slope estimate = .068, 95% CI = 0.025-0.113, p = .002).

Conclusions: P300 amplitude was smaller in cigarette smokers than in nonsmoking controls, and a possible dose-response relationship was apparent. Findings indicate a possible association between cigarette smoking and decreased P300 amplitude.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Event-Related Potentials, P300*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Sex Factors
  • Smoking / physiopathology*
  • Time Factors
  • Young Adult