Lessons learned from the intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer in the quest for precision therapy

Br J Surg. 2014 Jul;101(8):925-38. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9562. Epub 2014 May 21.

Abstract

Background: Wide variability in breast cancer, between patients and within each individual neoplasm, adds confounding complexity to the treatment of the disease. In clinical practice, hormone receptor status has been used to classify breast tumours and to guide treatment. Modern classification systems should take the wide tumour heterogeneity into account to improve patient outcome.

Methods: This article reviews the identification of the intrinsic molecular subtypes of breast cancer, their prognostic and therapeutic implications, and the impact of tumour heterogeneity on cancer progression and treatment. The possibility of functionally addressing tumour-specific characteristics in in vivo models to inform decisions for precision therapies is also discussed.

Results: Despite the robust breast tumour classification system provided by gene expression profiling, heterogeneity is also evident within these molecular portraits. A complicating factor in breast cancer classification is the process of selective clonality within developing neoplasms. Phenotypically and functionally distinct clones representing the intratumour heterogeneity might confuse molecular classification. Molecular portraits of the heterogeneous primary tumour might not necessarily reflect the subclone of cancer cells that causes the disease to relapse. Studies of reciprocal relationships between cancer cell subpopulations within developing tumours are therefore needed, and are possible only in genetically engineered mouse models or patient-derived xenograft models, in which the treatment-induced selection pressure on individual cell clones can be mimicked.

Conclusion: In the future, more refined classifications, based on integration of information at several molecular levels, are required to improve treatment guidelines. Large-scale translational research efforts paved the way for identification of the intrinsic subtypes, and are still fundamental for ensuring future progress in cancer care.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Biomarkers, Tumor / genetics
  • Breast Neoplasms / classification*
  • Breast Neoplasms / genetics
  • Breast Neoplasms / therapy
  • Disease Models, Animal
  • Female
  • Genes, Neoplasm / genetics*
  • Genetic Markers / genetics
  • Humans
  • Mice
  • Mutation
  • Neoplasm Transplantation
  • Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent / classification
  • Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent / genetics
  • Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent / therapy
  • Prognosis
  • Transplantation, Heterologous

Substances

  • Biomarkers, Tumor
  • Genetic Markers