Multicenter study of outcome in relation to the type of resection in rectal cancer

Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Jul;57(7):811-22. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000026.

Abstract

Background: A surgical teaching and auditing program has been implemented to improve the results of treatment for patients with rectal cancer.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the treatment and outcome in patients resected for rectal cancer, focusing on differences relating to the type of resection.

Design: This was an observational study.

Settings: The study took place throughout the network of hospitals that compose the National Health Service in Spain.

Patients: This study included a consecutive cohort of 3355 patients from the Spanish Rectal Cancer Project. The data of patients who were operated on electively, with curative intent, by anterior resection (n = 2333 [69.5%]), abdominoperineal excision (n = 774 [23.1%]), and Hartmann procedure (n = 248 [7.4%]) between March 2006 and May 2010 were analyzed.

Main outcome measures: Clinical, pathologic, and outcome results were analyzed in relation to the type of surgery performed.

Results: After a median follow-up time of 37 months (interquartile range, 30-48 months), bowel perforations were found to be more common in the Hartmann procedure (12.6%) and abdominoperineal groups (10.1%) than in the anterior resection group (2.3%; p < 0.001). Involvement of the circumferential resection margin was also more common in the Hartmann (16.6%) and abdominoperineal groups (14.3%) than in the anterior resection group (6.6%; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed a negative influence on local recurrence, metastasis, survival for advanced stage, intraoperative perforation, invaded circumferential margin, and Hartmann procedure. However, abdominoperineal excision did not significantly influence local recurrence (HR, 0.945; 95% CI, 0.571-1.563; p = 0.825).

Limitations: The main weakness of this study was the voluntary nature of registration in the Spanish Rectal Cancer Project.

Conclusions: Although bowel perforation and involvement of the circumferential resection margin were more common after abdominoperineal excision than after anterior resection, this study did not identify abdominoperineal excision as a determinant of local recurrence in the context of 3 years of median follow-up.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Observational Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Digestive System Surgical Procedures / methods*
  • Elective Surgical Procedures / methods*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Male
  • Medical Audit
  • Middle Aged
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Quality Improvement
  • Rectal Neoplasms / mortality
  • Rectal Neoplasms / pathology
  • Rectal Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Rectum / pathology
  • Rectum / surgery*
  • Spain
  • Treatment Outcome