Heading for the hills: risk avoidance drives den site selection in African wild dogs

PLoS One. 2014 Jun 11;9(6):e99686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099686. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Compared to their main competitors, African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) have inferior competitive abilities and interspecific competition is a serious fitness-limiting factor. Lions (Panthera leo) are the dominant large carnivore in African savannah ecosystems and wild dogs avoid them both spatially and temporally. Wild dog young are particularly vulnerable and suffer high rates of mortality from lions. Since lions do not utilize all parts of the landscape with an equal intensity, spatial variation in lion densities can be exploited by wild dogs both during their general ranging behaviour, but more specifically when they are confined to a den with vulnerable young. Since patches of rugged terrain are associated with lower lion densities, we hypothesized that these comparatively safe habitats should be selected by wild dogs for denning. We investigated the relationship between the distribution of 100 wild dog den sites and the occurrence of rugged terrain in four wild dog populations located in Tanzania, Zimbabwe and South Africa. A terrain ruggedness index was derived from a 90 m digital elevation model and used to map terrain ruggedness at each site. We compared characteristics of actual and potential (random) den sites to determine how wild dogs select den sites. The distributions of wild dog dens were strongly associated with rugged terrain and wild dogs actively selected terrain that was more rugged than that available on average. The likelihood of encountering lions is reduced in these habitats, minimizing the risk to both adults and pups. Our findings have important implications for the conservation management of the species, especially when assessing habitat suitability for potential reintroductions. The simple technique used to assess terrain ruggedness may be useful to investigate habitat suitability, and even predict highly suitable denning areas, across large landscapes.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Behavior, Animal / physiology*
  • Dogs / physiology*
  • Ecosystem
  • Grassland
  • Lions / physiology*
  • Risk
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Zimbabwe

Grants and funding

Financial support for work in the various study areas was received from the following: Work in Zimbabwe: Rufford Small Grants Foundation (1st and 2nd Rufford Small Grant; Reference: 16.04.08 and 50.10.09) (http://www.rufford.org/); Columbus Zoo and Aquarium (http://www.colszoo.org/); Disney Worldwide Conservation Fund (http://thewaltdisneycompany.com/citizenship/environmental-stewardship/disney-worldwide-conservation-fund); National Geographic Conservation Trust (Grant C183-10) (http://www.nationalgeographic.com/explorers/grants-programs/conservation-trust-application/); USFWS Wildlife Without Borders (Agreement number 96200-1-G236) (http://www.fws.gov/international/wildlife-without-borders/); and Sea World and Busch Gardens (www.swbg-conservationfund.org). Work in South Africa (Venetia Limpopo Nature Reserve): The Endangered Wildlife Trust (www.ewt.org.za); Land Rover Jaguar South Africa (www.jlrcorp.co.za); and De Beers Consolidated Mines (www.debeersgroup.com/operations/mining/mining-operations/de-beers-consolidated-mines). Work in Tanzania: Frankfurt Zoological Society (www.zgf.de/?id=8&language=en) and Vodacom Tanzania (www.vodacom.co.tz). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.