Objective: The purpose of this article is to prospectively determine the value of stress dual-energy CT (DECT) myocardial perfusion imaging to coronary CT angiography (CTA) for the assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) in a high-risk population.
Subjects and methods: We prospectively enrolled 29 consecutive patients who were referred for cardiac SPECT examinations for known or suspected CAD to also undergo pharmacologic stress cardiac DECT. In 25 patients, cardiac catheterization was available as the reference standard for morphologically significant stenosis. The performance of coronary CTA alone, DECT myocardial perfusion alone, and the combination of both was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values.
Results: For morphologically significant stenosis, coronary CTA alone and myocardial DECT assessment alone had 95% sensitivity and 50% specificity. The combined approach yielded 100% sensitivity and 33% specificity if either was positive and 90% sensitivity and 67% specificity if both were positive. The AUC value was highest (0.78) if both were positive. For hemodynamically significant lesions, coronary CTA alone had 91% sensitivity and 38% specificity, and DECT alone had 95% sensitivity and 75% specificity. The combined approach yielded 100% sensitivity and 38% specificity if either was positive and 86% sensitivity and 75% specificity if both were positive. AUC values were highest for DECT alone (0.85) and the "both positive" evaluation (0.80).
Conclusion: The combined analysis of coronary CTA and DECT myocardial perfusion reduces the number of false-positives in a high-risk population for CAD and outperforms the purely anatomic test of coronary CTA alone for the detection of morphologically and hemodynamically significant CAD.
Keywords: SPECT; coronary CT angiography; dual-energy CT; high-risk population; myocardial perfusion imaging.