[Clinical aspects of 41 cases performed challenge test with immediate-type wheat allergy due to hydrolyzed wheat protein (HWP-IWA)]

Arerugi. 2014 Jun;63(6):775-86.
[Article in Japanese]

Abstract

Background: Immediate-type wheat allergy due to hydrolyzed wheat protein (HWP-IWA) supplemented soap has been a serious social issue. We investigated the significance of challenge test and other tests not only to diagnose HWP-IWA but to know the symptoms of each patients.

Methods: From January 2010 to June 2012, we performed challenge test in 41 cases with positive prick test of Glupearl 19S®, a major allergic HWP found in Cha no Shizuku®.

Results: Thirty nine of 41 cases were challenge test positive. In two patients who showed positive skin prick test but negative for challenge test, titer of specific IgE antibody and/or basophil histamine release test against Glupearl 19S® revealed positive reaction.

Conclusion: Challenge test is not included in indispensable examinations for the diagnosis of HWP-IWA in the recommended guidelines. However, challenge test is still a useful tool for assessing actual severity of each patient's symptoms and determining the timing of cessation of wheat avoidance. In addition, combined check-up with several laboratory examination and challenge test may help appropriate diagnosis of HWP-IWA.

Publication types

  • English Abstract
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Humans
  • Hydrolysis
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Plant Proteins / immunology*
  • Soaps / adverse effects
  • Triticum / immunology*
  • Wheat Hypersensitivity / diagnosis
  • Wheat Hypersensitivity / immunology*

Substances

  • Plant Proteins
  • Soaps