Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate compliance with the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principle by practitioners seeking credentialing for nuchal translucency (NT) measurement between 11 and 14 weeks' gestation.
Methods: Nuchal Translucency Quality Review Program credentialing requires quantitative scoring of 5 NT measurements from 5 different fetuses. Images submitted by 100 consecutive practitioners were retrospectively evaluated for the output display standard (ODS). The thermal index (TI) type (bone [TIb] or soft tissue [TIs]) and numeric value of the index were recorded. The TIb was considered the correct index for this study. Compliance with the numeric value was evaluated in several ways. Collectively, a TIb lower than 0.5 was considered optimal, lower than 0.7 compliant, and 1.0 or lower satisfactory.
Results: An ODS was present in at least 1 image submitted by 77 practitioners. The TIb was used exclusively by 15 (19.5%), the TIs by 37 (48.1%), and 25 used a combination of the TIb and TIs. Only 4 of 77 providers (5%) used the correct TI type (TIb) at lower than 0.5 for all submitted images, 5 of 77 (6%) at lower than 0.7, and 9 of 77 (12%) at 1.0 or lower. A TI (TIb or TIs) higher than 1.0 was used by 15 of 77 providers (19.5%). Proficiency in NT measurement and educational background (physician or sonographer) did not influence compliance with ALARA.
Conclusions: Clinicians seeking credentialing in NT do not demonstrate compliance with the recommended use of the TIb in monitoring acoustic output.
Keywords: ALARA; Nuchal Translucency Quality Review Program; biosafety; fetal sonography; nuchal translucency; thermal index; ultrasound education.
© 2014 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.