Consequences of tibial tunnel reaming on the meniscal roots during cruciate ligament reconstruction in a cadaveric model, Part 2: The posterior cruciate ligament

Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jan;43(1):207-12. doi: 10.1177/0363546514554771. Epub 2014 Oct 31.

Abstract

Background: Recent emphasis has turned to reconstructing the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) after injury. However, single-bundle PCL reconstruction of the anterolateral bundle may potentially injure the posterior meniscal roots.

Purpose/hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to determine if posterior meniscal root injuries occurred because of tunnel reaming for single-bundle PCL reconstruction. It was hypothesized that tibial tunnel reaming within the anterolateral bundle footprint during PCL reconstruction would result in clinically significant decreases in posteromedial (PM) root attachment areas and in ultimate failure strength for the PM root.

Study design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Testing was performed on 12 matched pairs of human cadaveric knees. For each pair of knees, one knee was left intact, while the contralateral knee was prepared with a tibial tunnel placed 5 mm anterior to the center of the tibial PCL attachment and within the previously described footprint of the anterolateral bundle of the PCL for single-bundle PCL reconstruction. The attachment areas of the posterior meniscal roots were measured with a coordinate measuring device before and after PCL tunnel reaming. The posterior meniscal roots were then pulled to failure with a dynamic tensile testing machine.

Results: There was a significant mean decrease in the attachment area of the PM root (%Δ, 28%; 95% CI, 16-40) after PCL tunnel reaming compared with the intact state (P=.005). The mean ultimate failure strength of the native PM root (mean, 440 N; 95% CI, 347-534) was also significantly stronger (mean, 40%; 95% CI, 18-61; P=.005) than that of the PM root after PCL tunnel reaming (mean, 243 N; 95% CI, 176-309). No changes were found for the posterolateral (PL) root after PCL tunnel reaming.

Conclusion: Tibial tunnel reaming for single-bundle PCL reconstruction in the anterolateral bundle footprint significantly reduced the ultimate failure strength and attachment area of the PM meniscal root. The attachment area and ultimate failure strength of the PL root were unaffected by tunnel reaming.

Clinical relevance: Tibial tunnels reamed in the footprint of the anterolateral bundle during single-bundle PCL reconstruction can cause iatrogenic damage to the PM meniscal root attachment. Thus, tibial tunnels should strive to be reamed in the center of the entire tibial PCL attachment site during PCL reconstruction.

Keywords: medial meniscus; meniscal roots; posterior cruciate ligament; posterior meniscal roots.

MeSH terms

  • Arthroplasty / adverse effects*
  • Arthroplasty / methods
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Cadaver
  • Humans
  • Knee Injuries / etiology*
  • Knee Injuries / physiopathology
  • Knee Joint / surgery
  • Male
  • Menisci, Tibial / physiopathology
  • Middle Aged
  • Osteotomy / methods*
  • Posterior Cruciate Ligament / surgery*
  • Tensile Strength
  • Tibia / surgery*
  • Tibial Meniscus Injuries*