Middle-of-the-night percutaneous coronary intervention and its association with percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes performed the following day: an analysis from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jan;8(1 Pt A):49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.08.010.

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to compare in-hospital mortality and bleeding complications for procedures performed by sleep-deprived versus non-sleep-deprived operators.

Background: To optimize the safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), it is essential to determine whether physicians performing emergent, middle-of-the-night procedures, and who may be sleep-deprived as a consequence, have equally safe outcomes when performing cases the following day.

Methods: We used CathPCI registry data to compare in-hospital mortality and bleeding complications for procedures performed by sleep-deprived versus non-sleep-deprived operators using logistic regression with generalized estimating equations to account for within-operator clustering. Outcomes were risk-adjusted using previously validated models for in-hospital mortality and bleeding. Our cohort included 1,509,096 daytime PCI procedures performed by 5,014 operators between 7 am and midnight from July 1, 2009, through June 30, 2012. Operators were assumed to be acutely sleep-deprived if they began a middle-of-the-night PCI between midnight and 6:59 am and performed a next-day PCI between 7 am and midnight, and chronically sleep deprived if they had performed multiple middle-of-the-night PCI procedures during the previous 7 days.

Results: Only 2.4% of all daytime PCI procedures were performed by operators who had performed at least 1 middle-of-the-night PCI procedure earlier that day. In adjusted analyses, when comparing procedures performed by acutely sleep-deprived with non-sleep-deprived operators, there were no significant differences in mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94 to 1.12; p = 0.61) or bleeding (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.08; p = 0.19). However, a greater degree of chronic sleep deprivation was associated with a higher adjusted risk of bleeding (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.34; p = 0.007).

Conclusions: Daytime PCI procedures are uncommonly performed by sleep-deprived operators. We found no signal of increased complications when acutely sleep-deprived operators performed PCI but an increased risk of bleeding associated with procedures performed by operators with greater degrees of chronic sleep deprivation.

Keywords: angioplasty; hemorrhage; mortality; sleep.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • After-Hours Care*
  • Aged
  • Chi-Square Distribution
  • Clinical Competence*
  • Emergencies
  • Female
  • Hemorrhage / etiology
  • Hemorrhage / mortality
  • Hospital Mortality
  • Humans
  • Logistic Models
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Odds Ratio
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / adverse effects*
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / mortality
  • Personnel Staffing and Scheduling*
  • Quality Indicators, Health Care
  • Registries
  • Risk Factors
  • Sleep Deprivation / etiology*
  • Sleep Deprivation / physiopathology
  • Sleep Deprivation / psychology
  • Sleep*
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United States