Anisole and fluoroanisoles display distinct conformational preferences, as evident from a survey of their crystal structures. In addition to altering the free ligand conformation, various degrees of fluorination have a strong impact on physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties. Analysis of anisole and fluoroanisole matched molecular pairs in the Pfizer corporate database reveals interesting trends: 1) PhOCF3 increases log D by ~1 log unit over PhOCH3 compounds; 2) PhOCF3 shows lower passive permeability despite its higher lipophilicity; and 3) PhOCF3 does not appreciably improve metabolic stability over PhOCH3 . Emerging from the investigation, difluoroanisole (PhOCF2 H) strikes a better balance of properties with noticeable advantages of log D and transcellular permeability over PhOCF3 . Synthetic assessment illustrates that the routes to access difluoroanisoles are often more straightforward than those for trifluoroanisoles. Whereas replacing PhOCH3 with PhOCF3 is a common tactic to optimize ADME properties, our analysis suggests PhOCF2 H may be a more attractive alternative, and greater exploitation of this motif is recommended.
Keywords: ADME profiles; anisoles; drug design; fluorination; metabolic stability.
© 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.